Skip to main content

This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1499

reference
574-tree-1
name
1499
tree-preservation-order

undefined

574-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-0.971429 50.866897)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-0.971358 50.866890,-0.971362 50.866904,-0.971371 50.866916,-0.971387 50.866926,-0.971407 50.866933,-0.971428 50.866935,-0.971450 50.866933,-0.971470 50.866927,-0.971486 50.866917,-0.971497 50.866905,-0.971500 50.866891,-0.971497 50.866877,-0.971488 50.866864,-0.971472 50.866854,-0.971452 50.866848,-0.971430 50.866845,-0.971408 50.866847,-0.971388 50.866854,-0.971373 50.866863,-0.971362 50.866876,-0.971358 50.866890)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL